You're not permitted to post shouts.
IronPatriotDocMelon posts political contradictions on a political board. Expects not to have political hypocrisy exposed. Can't make this stuff up.08/08/2015 - 12:25am
IronPatriotDocMelon: "Once again IP you're attacking me for a contradictory post I made. I prefer you don't make such attacks." LOL.08/08/2015 - 12:24am
MattsworknameSorry, I mean to say the current admin hasn't been taking the country in the right direction08/07/2015 - 11:36pm
Mattsworknamewrong direction.08/07/2015 - 11:35pm
MattsworknameAlso, the point i was as making papa was that the debate was the biggest thing in cable tv history. There has to be a reason, and my guess is, after the last six years, maybe people are starting the current administratoin hasn't been taking things in the08/07/2015 - 11:35pm
MattsworknamePapa: relax man, Im just being a cynic right now. Im actaully a fan of stewart, even though I don't always agree with him, I stil enjoyed his show. I was just being a bit of a tease08/07/2015 - 10:19pm
PHX Corp EFF Told To “Shut The Hell Up” About SOPA08/07/2015 - 10:01pm
Goth_SkunkTempted to refrain from referring to the symbol as a 'hashtag' and instead refer to it by it's proper name, 'Octothorpe.'08/07/2015 - 9:59pm
Papa Midnightridiculous hashtag like this is Twitter or something?08/07/2015 - 9:56pm
Papa MidnightIn addition to that, do you know how those statistics were even gathered? If it's based on Nielsen Media Ratings, then toss that crap out the window because their ratings model has been broken for 20 years. Or did you just want an excuse to draw up a08/07/2015 - 9:56pm
Papa Midnight...on a broadcast which stands tantamount to the future of a nation, and compare it to an hour-long special for the ending of Jon Stewart's show - which, as a point of record, in terms of Cable TV ratings, 3.3 Million Viewers is outstanding.08/07/2015 - 9:55pm
Papa MidnightFurther more, how did you draw that line from 24 Million Viewers on a broadcast which was simulcast across the highest rated 24-Hour News Network in America, Sky News in the UK, YouTube (in real-time), and several other networks...08/07/2015 - 9:54pm
Papa MidnightHow in the blue hell did you make that connection?08/07/2015 - 9:53pm
MattsworknameThe republican debate had over 24 million viewers, jon stewarts farwell? 3.3. Seems like the reps are the ones the people wanna hear from, gee, wonder why? #8yearsoffailobama08/07/2015 - 9:29pm
Goth_Skunk"An honest politician is one who stays bought once he's bought." - Simon Cameron08/07/2015 - 8:49pm
Andrew Eisen - 8:12pm
Andrew EisenBest review I've seen (as in "most kind to the film") came from Devin Faraci who said the first two acts were solid but the film completely faceplants the third.08/07/2015 - 8:11pm
E. Zachary KnightBased on the one clip I saw of Doctor Doom, I would be inclined to agree.08/07/2015 - 8:05pm
E. Zachary KnightSo, Based on every review I have read today, Fantastic Four is an unmitigated disaster. The worst FF since Rise of the Silver Surfer.08/07/2015 - 8:05pm
DocMelonheadOnce again IP you're attacking me for a contradictory post I made. I prefer you don't make such attacks.08/07/2015 - 8:00pm
Mattsworknameip: Would put to much faith in the dem this time. Once hilariy gets the nom, assuming she gets it, the Reps are gonna rip her apart. If sanders gets the nom, ohh, the reps are gonna have a field day with him.08/07/2015 - 7:54pm
IronPatriotDocMelon, there is no answer to that question which makes your contradictory statement any less wrong.08/07/2015 - 7:54pm
DocMelonheadThat's true, but will he himself be president, or will that goes to Hillary Clinton?08/07/2015 - 7:48pm
IronPatriotDocMelon says "not even the democrats can do that: the only candidate that might have a chance of making that change is Bernie Sanders himself" ... who is running as a DEMOCRAT. Try reading what you actually write.08/07/2015 - 7:46pm
IronPatriotMattsworkname, then it's a good thing that the only system that has been 100% accurate predicts a Democratic presidential victory.08/07/2015 - 7:45pm
DocMelonheadThe best chance of such of a change is to hold the elite accountable, and not even the democrats can do that: the only candidate that might have a chance of making that change is Bernie Sanders himself.08/07/2015 - 7:42pm
DocMelonheadAlso, you failed to address the elephant in the room, that is both the senate and congress; along with the lobbyist group. Even if Democrats wins by a margin, aren't you worried that the Republicans might still screw us over.08/07/2015 - 7:41pm
DocMelonheadPretty much. Plus you got the republicans in both the sentate and the congress wanted to kill that deal.08/07/2015 - 7:38pm
MattsworknameIP: Less invadible for the next year, soon as he's out of office, if a republican wins election, that Iran deal goes out the window and iran is glass in a few years, least thats what I suspect might happen08/07/2015 - 7:35pm
IronPatriotName one what? You are still wrong that the rest of the world will be invaded if they have oil. You can't refute Obama making Iran less invadable by Republicans.08/07/2015 - 7:34pm
Mattsworknamepretty much guess where I fall on the topics of discussion.08/07/2015 - 7:34pm
MattsworknameWow, I go to bed and I come back to find some really interesting and heated debate going on. And Ip is involved without being a broken record. Mark the calender, this is a day to remember. I won't comment on the topics though, I think everyone here could08/07/2015 - 7:33pm
DocMelonheadIn fact name one from an independent news source that claimed that everything fine.08/07/2015 - 7:29pm
DocMelonheadfor the corporations, which I emplied that it doesn't make a different. There's more terrible people out there than republicans.08/07/2015 - 7:28pm
IronPatriotYou are wrong again, DocMelon. Iran has lots of oil, and Obama worked hard to make sure the Republicans won't have a pretext to invade Iran.08/07/2015 - 7:20pm
IronPatriotDoc, also most of the rest of the world cares who the US president is: The Rest of the World Is Pretty Happy With President Obama's Handling of World Affairs08/07/2015 - 7:19pm
DocMelonheadrepublicans or not, they'll be invaded: as long as Oil is involved.08/07/2015 - 7:18pm
IronPatriotFor instance, the non-Americans in a country for whom NOT getting invaded depends on NOT having another Republican US president care. 08/07/2015 - 7:13pm
DocMelonheadTHen again, in the eyes of non americans: "WHO CARES?"08/07/2015 - 7:04pm
DocMelonheadIt's best to wait until october to check on it, as I mention before, it will update it's predictions based off of current events.08/07/2015 - 7:02pm
IronPatriotWrong Goth. If it is " surprisingly easy to predict with 100% accuracy the winner of a race" then where are a load of other analytical models with 100% accuracy?08/07/2015 - 6:52pm
Goth_SkunkIt's surprisingly easy to predict with 100% accuracy the winner of a race when you spend the entire race following the leader.08/07/2015 - 6:39pm
IronPatriotSo what?08/07/2015 - 6:38pm
DocMelonheadThere's also the TPP that can factor in the electorial debate, along with Obamacare.08/07/2015 - 6:32pm
IronPatriotDocMelon, yes, that's how it works. So I'm still sure that the only forecasting model that has been 100% accurate predicts a Democratic president wins in a close race.08/07/2015 - 6:28pm
DocMelonheadWhat it said now may not be the same as it will be by election day.08/07/2015 - 6:27pm
DocMelonhead"Moody’s will update its prediction each month in the run-up to November 2016"08/07/2015 - 6:26pm
IronPatriotDocMelon, yes, I am sure that the only forecasting model that has been 100% accurate predicts a Democratic president wins in a close race. Did you bother to click the link before asking?08/07/2015 - 6:25pm
DocMelonheadPlus you have the Super PAC as well.08/07/2015 - 6:24pm
DocMelonheadYou sure about that, it seems that the Republicans have the entire government except for the executive branch.08/07/2015 - 6:21pm
IronPatriotThe only forecasting model that has been 100% accurate predicts a Democratic president wins in a close race: - 6:16pm
IronPatriotThen you are wrong again, DocMelon. Left-leaning corporate elites do not want another Reagan either.08/07/2015 - 6:13pm
DocMelonheadStill Trump may have a chance if those whose wanted to see an new american revolution to take place in the near future; they gave up on the government anyways.08/07/2015 - 6:10pm
DocMelonheadI said corporate elites, as in elites of both sides.08/07/2015 - 6:07pm
IronPatriotWrong, DocMelon. The Republican elites do not want immigrant amnesty, tax raises, and gun bans, so Republican elites so NOT want another Reagan.08/07/2015 - 6:06pm
IronPatriotMatthew Wilson, you are right, Paul and Trump are very different politically. What they have in common is the disdain of the few elites who actually pick the Republican nominee every four years.08/07/2015 - 6:02pm
Matthew Wilson@ezk trump cant win the genaral. he would be crushed. @iron Paul is nothing like trump. trump is apealing to people who are very very far to the right.08/07/2015 - 5:24pm
DocMelonheadI think the Corporate elites wanted another Ronald Reagan.08/07/2015 - 5:24pm
IronPatriotChristie and Huckabee are too toxic. Rand Paul and Trump are unlikely to follow orders.08/07/2015 - 5:21pm
E. Zachary KnightIt really doesn't matter if he is getting any corporate backing. If he wins the nomination, those backers will fall all over themselves to back him.08/07/2015 - 5:19pm
IronPatriotThe Republican elites, looking to the general election, want an establishment candidate with low toxicity like Bush, Walker, or Kasich - just like the way they pretended Romney won.08/07/2015 - 5:19pm
Matthew Wilsonhe is appealing to the hard right, not the elites at all. he is apealing to the kind of person that would support ukip.08/07/2015 - 5:17pm
benohawk@james You mentioned more questionable news about comcept coming soon, what happened with that?08/07/2015 - 5:17pm
DocMelonheadSo who do you think will wins the supports of those elites, besides Trump.08/07/2015 - 5:14pm
DocMelonheadTrump and use his money to fund his way to victory. Then again, He got the rest of the corporate elites funding against him08/07/2015 - 5:10pm
IronPatriotConster, how can Trump win when the Republican elites pick the nominee regardless of Republican primary votes?08/07/2015 - 5:08pm
DocMelonheadTrump may win the popular vote in term of republicans for his honesty and bravery.08/07/2015 - 5:08pm
IronPatriotDocMelon, Let's just agree to disagree about, oh, abandoning all pleasure to make effective change. That and your love of hunting down human beings for "mob justice."08/07/2015 - 5:06pm
ConsterWait, someone actually believes Trump has a shot at winning?08/07/2015 - 5:06pm
DocMelonheadThat's the sad and harsh truth; you have to abandon all pleasures to change the world for the better.08/07/2015 - 5:04pm
IronPatriotEr... Doc, you do realize that these "entertainments" you want to "eliminate" include... video games?08/07/2015 - 5:02pm
DocMelonheadNothing that doesn't involves witch hunts, re-education, and all out elimination of distractions such as celebrity gossips, and entertainments; just about anything that inconvenient to the lifestyle we're living right now. 08/07/2015 - 4:57pm
DocMelonheadDonald Trump might as well become president since there's nothing we can do about the corporate elites.08/07/2015 - 4:56pm
DocMelonheadThe world is screwed since Ronald Reagan became president. And the Democracy dies out since the introduction of the Super PAC.08/07/2015 - 4:54pm
DocMelonheadThe only way Donald Trump may lose this one is when the Corporate puppets pushed an amendment that only allows government officials to run as president, grant that all of them are puppets.08/07/2015 - 4:51pm
IronPatriotWith none of them brave enough to deliver (or attempt) a knockout blow to Trump, it's hard to see how the others will get attention needed for supporting, oh, say, the Constitution.08/07/2015 - 4:50pm
IronPatriotI don't think Rand Paul ever really recovered from Trump's mock pity "You’re having a hard time tonight."08/07/2015 - 4:49pm
DocMelonheadWhat to know the harsh truth? Only The 67 people on the planet can select the president of the united states.08/07/2015 - 4:49pm
IronPatriotPaul hurt Christie among people who care about the Constitution. Christie hurt Rand Paul among people who pee their Depends at the mention of ISIS (the Fox News demographic).08/07/2015 - 4:42pm
james_fudgenever trust the pundits08/07/2015 - 4:23pm
james_fudgehe hurt Christie, who argued against the 4th amendment08/07/2015 - 4:23pm
IronPatriotA completely depressing spectacle (if you happen to love the USA)08/07/2015 - 4:00pm
IronPatriot"Sensing his defeat, Paul concluded by reminding the audience that Christie once gave Obama a “big hug” and that that’s something he should be embarrassed about it. Hugs = socialism."08/07/2015 - 3:55pm
IronPatriotThat salon article says "The fight consisted of Paul getting out-alpha’d by the New Jersey governor while defending the constitution and criticizing illegal government surveillance."08/07/2015 - 3:55pm
IronPatriotJames, yes, interesting that when Rand Paul attempted to remind Republicans of this thing called the Constitution he got smacked down by Chris Christie and resorted to whiny hug criticism.08/07/2015 - 3:53pm
james_fudgeI liked what Rand Paul said about the NSA08/07/2015 - 3:51pm
IronPatriotBest assessment of the debate I've seen yet.08/07/2015 - 3:43pm
IronPatriot"The candidates offered no policies, no plans, no ideas – only platitudes and awkwardly delivered snipes"08/07/2015 - 3:43pm
IronPatriot"The moderators set the tone with their inane questions and refusal to demand intelligible answers. As best I could tell, their job was to smile and nod affirmatively. (Except when it came to Donald Trump.)"08/07/2015 - 3:43pm
IronPatriotAndrew, hilarious link. Another Salon link sums up the debate: "Almost nothing of substance was said by any of the candidates."08/07/2015 - 3:43pm
Big PermCan't do contacts. Can barely do eyedrops. I can't help but start visuallizing horrible horror movie mishaps when putting something near my eye08/07/2015 - 3:36pm
Goth_SkunkPut on contact lenses for the first time in over a year. EVERYTHING IS SO HUEG!08/07/2015 - 3:32pm
DocMelonhead....Especially when said candidate is a bigoted corporate elite himself; which is why I kinda like Donald Trump, he didn't hire other republicans to do his dirty work.08/07/2015 - 3:26pm
E. Zachary KnightStarting tomorrow and for the 10 days following, I will be makign a game styled after the Gameboy. It is going to be fun.08/07/2015 - 3:26pm
DocMelonheadWhen it comes to Republicans being puppets of the bigoted corporate elite, it's comforting to know that one of the candidates isn't one of those puppets....08/07/2015 - 3:25pm
Andrew EisenFrom: - 3:11pm
Andrew Eisen"The moderators didn’t follow up to find out whether, had the child turned out to be merely mediocre, Trump would have remained pro-choice."08/07/2015 - 3:11pm
Andrew Eisen“And it wasn’t aborted. And that child today is a total superstar.”08/07/2015 - 3:11pm
Andrew Eisen"Donald Trump gave us a memorable Trumpism when asked why he changed his mind on abortion. Some friends “were going to have a child, and it was going to be aborted,” Trump shared."08/07/2015 - 3:11pm
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician